SK: Specific Legal Clarification Needed Desperately

[Marcel Frank Boesch PA-C]

In answer to this message, how do we go about changing this rediculous law? It is ok to have a dog, cat, lion, tiger which can be more harmful to humans that a cute gentle skunk.

It is okay with this government to have illegals come into this country with all their diseases that cause much greater harm to mankind than a skunk. They are born here!!!!

Some body in this government should wake up

Please tell me how we all can help!!! MY little guy was  the greatest and still is!!! 

Best MArcel 


----- Original Message ----
From: "SkunkLady2 at aol.com" <SkunkLady2 at aol.com>
To: skunks at rdwarf.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 2:39:26 PM
Subject: SK: Specific Legal Clarification Needed Desperately

skunks are a rabies vector species and that is the problem. 

WILD skunks are considered to be such.  DOMESTIC/PEN-RAISED skunks should not 
be.  There is no carrier state for rabies.  We've had our skunks longer than 
8 days.  There are only two ways to contract rabies:  being bitten by a rabid 
animal or eating carrion that was rabid.  Since I doubt anyone has rabid-dead 
meat laying around......and our skunks are inside companions....they do NOT 
have rabies.

This is yet ANOTHER reason that we MUST get a distinct, LEGAL differentiation 
between wild skunks and domestic skunks or we will NEVER stand a chance!  Our 
skunks are NOT wildlife and have not 
been for 200 years!!!

Shelor



**************
The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy 
Awards. Go to AOL Music.
      
(http://music.aol.com/grammys?NCID=aolcmp00300000002565)
_______________________________________________
Skunks maillist  -  Skunks at rdwarf.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.rdwarf.com/mailman/listinfo/skunks


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs