SK: Specific Legal Clarification Needed Desperately
Marcel Frank Boesch PA-C
mfbpac2 at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 13 12:27:28 PST 2008
In answer to this message, how do we go about changing this rediculous law? It is ok to have a dog, cat, lion, tiger which can be more harmful to humans that a cute gentle skunk.
It is okay with this government to have illegals come into this country with all their diseases that cause much greater harm to mankind than a skunk. They are born here!!!!
Some body in this government should wake up
Please tell me how we all can help!!! MY little guy was the greatest and still is!!!
----- Original Message ----
From: "SkunkLady2 at aol.com" <SkunkLady2 at aol.com>
To: skunks at rdwarf.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 2:39:26 PM
Subject: SK: Specific Legal Clarification Needed Desperately
skunks are a rabies vector species and that is the problem.
WILD skunks are considered to be such. DOMESTIC/PEN-RAISED skunks should not
be. There is no carrier state for rabies. We've had our skunks longer than
8 days. There are only two ways to contract rabies: being bitten by a rabid
animal or eating carrion that was rabid. Since I doubt anyone has rabid-dead
meat laying around......and our skunks are inside companions....they do NOT
This is yet ANOTHER reason that we MUST get a distinct, LEGAL differentiation
between wild skunks and domestic skunks or we will NEVER stand a chance! Our
skunks are NOT wildlife and have not
been for 200 years!!!
The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy
Awards. Go to AOL Music.
Skunks maillist - Skunks at rdwarf.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.rdwarf.com/mailman/listinfo/skunks
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
More information about the Skunks