http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/23/technology/circuits/23diar.html
Article describing the results of a Perseus Development study on blogs indicated that 2/3 of the 4.12 million blogs were abandoned [defined as not updated for at least two months] -- over a million blogs lasted exactly a day. Under 2% of blogs were updated daily, and only 9.9% had a posting linking to national news. What then, are blogs there for?
This does not mean that blogs are useless, only that their development is proceeding apace. In particular, I do not think that a blog necessarily needs daily updating, and in fact do not update this one every day. On the other hand, were I not to update at least weeky, this blog would lose much of its function. Other blogs, on other subjects, may have a longer or shorter update frequency.
Nevertheless, a blog should be updated more than once to really count..
Note there are some other IT articles in this same URL reference.
Posted by jho at October 27, 2003 11:50 AMSweet mercy is nobility's true badge. zovirax buy zovirax Thou shalt be both the plaintiff and the judge of thine own cause.
Posted by: zovirax at November 16, 2004 12:32 PM