http://entmag.com/reports/article.asp?EditorialsID=51
One thing which should be clear to all System Administrators is that Server 2003 and W2KS are not, compared to NT, "your father's Oldsmobile". Even Microsoft's bitterest critics agree that the later versions of the server OS are capable and much more secure than NT, which really did not qualify as "enterprise-ready".
Some of the 'ways of thought' which prevailed in the NT days have carried over to the later server versions, according to this article, which downplays many of the previous problems which NT had. Worth reading in itself, but made even more so by the spirited and diverse commentary attached to each reason discussed.
Posted by jho at October 22, 2003 11:32 AM